Comparison of Liberal and Republican Citizenship Theories in Various Countries
Author(s) : Ade Sopyan Hadi; Samsuri
Institution : Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Category : Article, IJMMU.
Topics : Comparison of Liberal and Republican Citizenship Theories in Various Countries
Abstract : The rapid development of globalization needs to be filtered according to Pancasila. If we examinethe French state, it can be seen that the republican model of citizenship is ideal for the pluralism ofBrubaker and Cooper (Lurbe, 2015). Estonia has received a high international assessment for the qualityof liberal democracy (Khoma & Kokoriev, 2021). Therefore, we can instill the spirit of tolerance, andpluralism and maintain democracy in accordance with Pancasila. The aim of this research is to determineliberal and republican citizenship theories, as well as their comparisons in various countries. The type ofresearch used is a literature study. A literature study is said to be a type of research carried out through theprocess of collecting data such as books, documents, articles, and so on (Saputri & Nuryono, 2018). Theresults of this research show that the theory of republican citizenship in Turkey, for example, the armedforces, is identified as a disciplined organization that defends the Republican regime (Kardam & Cengiz,2011). In the context of the Republic of Indonesia, republicans played a role in gaining independence(Wicaksono, 2019). Meanwhile, the comparison is that liberal citizenship theory prioritizes freedom whilerepublican citizenship theory focuses on the spirit of struggle. The conclusion is that liberal andrepublican theories of citizenship are suitable for one country and less suitable for another country. This iscertainly influenced by the country’s background.
Article can be download here >> https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/5976
About Author
